Wikipedia talk:WikiProject Mythology
| This is the talk page for discussing WikiProject Mythology and anything related to its purposes and tasks. |
|
Archives: 1, 2, 3Auto-archiving period: 3 months  |
 | This project page does not require a rating on Wikipedia's content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | |||||||
| ||||||||
Talk:Invented_tradition#Merge_from_pseudo-mythology
[edit]Please say a word at Talk:Invented_tradition#Merge_from_pseudo-mythology
Remove "____ equivalent" fields from Template:Infobox deity?
[edit]What do editors think of the idea of removing the "____ equivalent" fields (eg. "Greek_equivalent", "Norse_equivalent", "Hinduism_equivalent", etc.) from Template:Infobox deity? Input at Template talk:Infobox deity would be appreciated. – Michael Aurel (talk) 05:40, 26 November 2024 (UTC)
Khandoba has been nominated for a good article reassessment. If you are interested in the discussion, please participate by adding your comments to the reassessment page. If concerns are not addressed during the review period, the good article status may be removed from the article. Z1720 (talk) 20:37, 27 November 2024 (UTC)
Discussion at Talk:Zagreus § Source for "In popular culture" section
[edit]
You are invited to join the discussion at Talk:Zagreus § Source for "In popular culture" section. This is a follow up to the 2021 RfC which established sources used in the subsection & is focused on if these sources should be replaced. Sariel Xilo (talk) 20:08, 1 December 2024 (UTC)
Is this removal justified? Not sure it needs sources
[edit][1].. Doug Weller talk 13:36, 24 December 2024 (UTC)
- Probably not, I'd say. Some parts could do with sources (eg. the "Hinduism" section), and some could probably use shortening (eg. the "Neopaganism" section), but I don't really see what's to be profited from removing, for instance, the entire "Pre-Columbian America" section. – Michael Aurel (talk) 15:48, 24 December 2024 (UTC)
Good article reassessment for Cú Chulainn
[edit]Cú Chulainn has been nominated for a good article reassessment. If you are interested in the discussion, please participate by adding your comments to the reassessment page. If concerns are not addressed during the review period, the good article status may be removed from the article. Z1720 (talk) 16:49, 28 December 2024 (UTC)
Good article reassessment for Naraka (Hinduism)
[edit]Naraka (Hinduism) has been nominated for a good article reassessment. If you are interested in the discussion, please participate by adding your comments to the reassessment page. If concerns are not addressed during the review period, the good article status may be removed from the article. Z1720 (talk) 00:09, 18 January 2025 (UTC)